<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Kelleher's Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.alexkelleher.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com</link>
	<description>Psychology, data, future gazing, and the internet.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Continuous partial attention (or how to focus on everything)</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/11/07/continuous-partial-attention-or-how-to-focus-on-everything/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/11/07/continuous-partial-attention-or-how-to-focus-on-everything/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=205</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Building, as I am, a companythat delivers user benefit from observing behavior and processing that data, I spend a lot of time looking into the latest research on human/internet behaviour.
The thing is, all this research is obviously very new.  We don&#8217;t yet fully understand how daily integration of online affects our brains, and our behaviour.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building, as I am, a <a href="http://www.favy.com" target="_blank">company</a>that delivers user benefit from observing behavior and processing that data, I spend a lot of time looking into the latest research on human/internet behaviour.</p>
<p>The thing is, all this research is obviously very new.  We don&#8217;t yet fully understand how daily integration of online affects our brains, and our behaviour.  But more studies are being done, like <a href="http://www.sciamdigital.com/index.cfm?fa=Products.ViewIssuePreview&amp;ARTICLEID_CHAR=B40234BB-08E5-BE3D-F3C2511DF44AC11C" target="_blank">this one</a> (subs required) in SciAm mind.</p>
<p>The premise is that a new condition is emerging in the &#8220;wired&#8221; user (and can develop very quickly even in unwired users) - <strong>continuous partial attention</strong>.  In other words, we are continually partly aware of a lot of different sources of information:  Our blackberry, our Skype IM, the site we&#8217;re currently on, the TV in the background, the iPod playlist, and so on.  They all get an even attention as we attempt to balance out the data streams.</p>
<p>This distracted mental state means that everything is in our peripheral attention, and almost nothing gets our undivided attention.  This applies really well to web behavior (I&#8217;ve spent a lot of time in a previous position watching people use the web), and is starting to seep out into social behaviour, eating patterns and life in general.  Online, it goes something like this&#8230;</p>
<p><em>Click, glance, read, glance, click, IM, scroll, email, ad, recommendation, skim read, tweet, click, glance&#8230;..</em></p>
<p>Today&#8217;s wired human, the article suggests, suffers from this kind of &#8220;digital fog&#8221;, gets irritated, distracted and socially less active.  Our brains just weren&#8217;t built for this.</p>
<p>Well, they will be soon. </p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s clear about the human brain, is it&#8217;s remarkable ability to change itself in response to what&#8217;s required of it.  Question is, whether we&#8217;re capable of continually partially attending lots of data streams, or we&#8217;ll need more and more tools to process them on our behalf, and bring us back to what we&#8217;re biologically built for - single-focus attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/11/07/continuous-partial-attention-or-how-to-focus-on-everything/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ofcom report - Share of Media</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/28/ofcom-report-share-of-media/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/28/ofcom-report-share-of-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 23:02:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This out in August, but missed me until now.   Ofcom&#8217;s (UK communications regulator) &#8220;Communications Market Report&#8220;.  Apart from talk of the UK getting faster broadband (I&#8217;m not holding my breath, although buying a BT iPlate increased my connection speeds by almost double, I kid you not), something grabbed my attention.  The share of media time in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This out in August, but missed me until now.   Ofcom&#8217;s (UK communications regulator) &#8220;<a href="http://www.ofcom.org.uk/research/cm/cmr08/" target="_blank">Communications Market Report</a>&#8220;.  Apart from talk of the UK getting faster broadband (I&#8217;m not holding my breath, although buying a <a href="http://www.broadbandbuyer.co.uk/Shop/ShopDetail.asp?ProductID=7256&amp;gclid=CIHszNy-yJYCFQyR1Qodtlo8yw" target="_blank">BT iPlate</a> increased my connection speeds by almost double, I kid you not), something grabbed my attention.  The share of media time in terms of average minutes spent a day in each medium is:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>TV: 218 minutes</strong></li>
<li><strong>Radio: 164 minutes</strong></li>
<li><strong>Internet: 60 minutes</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s right, the &#8220;lean-forward&#8221; medium we&#8217;re all breaking our backs over is a mere 60 minutes, or 13% of an average person&#8217;s day&#8230; </p>
<p>Mind you, as my digital TV reception worsens, any TV I do watch is online via iPlayer and the equivalents at ITV and Channel 4.  That&#8217;s kind of half &#8220;lean-forward&#8221; half &#8220;sit-back&#8221; behaviour, as a) the screen isn&#8217;t big enough to be that far away, and b) endless Outlook email alerts interrupt anything I do try and watch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/28/ofcom-report-share-of-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash Goodness</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/15/flash-goodness/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/15/flash-goodness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[UI]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often (i.e. not very often), the web springs a pleasant and unexpected surprise.  Like when I clicked on the &#8220;enter site&#8221; link on Searcy&#8217;s guide to the 30 St Mary Axe, London (the &#8220;Gherkin&#8221;).  
I won&#8217;t spoil it, give it a go!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.alexkelleher.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/flash2.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-200" title="40 30" src="http://blog.alexkelleher.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/flash2.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="156" /></a>Every so often (i.e. not very often), the web springs a pleasant and unexpected surprise.  Like when I clicked on the &#8220;enter site&#8221; link on Searcy&#8217;s guide to the 30 St Mary Axe, London (the &#8220;Gherkin&#8221;).  </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t spoil it,<strong> </strong><a href="http://www.searcys.co.uk/4030thegherkin/" target="_blank"><strong>give it a go</strong></a>!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/15/flash-goodness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Artificial intelligence - 25% of testers fooled</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/13/artificial-intelligence-25-of-testers-fooled/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/13/artificial-intelligence-25-of-testers-fooled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[AI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the first time, one &#8220;chat bot&#8221; managed to fool 25% of its human conversationalists that they were chatting to another human.   The annual Loebner prize ($3000, so they&#8217;re not in it for the money) was won by Elbot, created by Fred Roberts, this last Sunday.  The &#8220;Turing Test&#8221; model sets the interrogator behind a wall, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time, one &#8220;chat bot&#8221; managed to fool 25% of its human conversationalists that they were chatting to another human.   The annual <a href="http://www.loebner.net/Prizef/loebner-prize.html">Loebner prize</a> ($3000, so they&#8217;re not in it for the money) was won by Elbot, created by Fred Roberts, this last Sunday.  The &#8220;Turing Test&#8221; model sets the interrogator behind a wall, and has them converse with an unknown human-or-machine on the other side.  A machine that fools 30% of people is deemed (by Turing) to have passed, so we&#8217;re almost there, you&#8217;d think.</p>
<p>This is what I got from a quick chat with Elbot:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>E: </strong>Hello dear user and welcome to Elbot! Just wondering, could you enter a single word that describes your energy level?</p>
<p>Variable</p>
<p><strong>E: </strong>Well, my biorythms are all mixed up. Maybe because I&#8217;m not biological.</p>
<p>Way to give the loebner prize away!</p>
<p><strong>E: </strong>Do you think you will win the Loebner prize?</p>
<p>oh sure</p>
<p><strong>E:</strong> Please say that in some other way. I am not able to process ironic statements.</p></blockquote>
<p>And so on, but much more random as time went on.  Not sure I&#8217;d want to meet the 25% that were fooled, but you can make your own mind up by chatting to Elbot right now: <a href="http://www.elbot.com/">http://www.elbot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/13/artificial-intelligence-25-of-testers-fooled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 &#8220;future shock&#8221; predictions - well, 12 actually</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/09/10-future-shock-predictions-well-12-actually/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/09/10-future-shock-predictions-well-12-actually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[top lists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently Infoworld published their 10 &#8220;future shock&#8221; predictions.  Here they are, and what I think of them (and a couple of my own):
1.  Triumph of the cloud - following on from Amazon&#8217;s EC2 services and the like, and from early attempts such as SETI@home&#8217;sdistributed search for E.T.  Verdict: quite likely, but conflicts with the growth [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Recently Infoworld published their <a href="http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/09/23/39FE-future-shock_1.html" target="_blank">10 &#8220;future shock&#8221; predictions</a>.  Here they are, and what I think of them (and a couple of my own):</p>
<p>1.  <strong>Triumph of the cloud</strong> - following on from Amazon&#8217;s EC2 services and the like, and from early attempts such as <a href="mailto:SETI@home's">SETI@home&#8217;s</a>distributed search for E.T.  Verdict: quite likely, but conflicts with the growth in cheap-yet-powerful small webtops, mobile phones crammed with technology, and the commoditisation of high tech</p>
<p>2. <strong>Cyborg chic</strong>- by 2018 people will be evolving into cyborgs.  Though I think it will take (a lot) longer (viz Arthur C. Clarke predicting in 2001 - A Space Odyssey that we&#8217;d be colonizing the moon by now).  But head-embedded phones aren&#8217;t too far away, maybe 2025</p>
<p>3.  <strong>Everything works</strong>- a joke prediction that everything digital will work, though the prediction of &#8220;it even changes based on what you&#8217;re currently doing&#8221; is one I&#8217;m pretty much focused on right now&#8230;</p>
<p>4.  <strong>Nothing escapes you.</strong>  In other words, everything you do and experience lives on in a digital vault somewhere.  Actually, pretty useful and scary at the same time.  But inevitable.  Some people are &#8220;life logging&#8221; already</p>
<p>5.  <strong>Smartphones take center stage</strong>.  For sure they&#8217;ll be more ubiquitous and ever more useful, but I don&#8217;t think they&#8217;ll replace laptops/PCs in their current form.  Unless we evolve matchstick fingers and zoom lens in our eyes, we&#8217;re all of one broad size - and that size needs a keyboard and a screen.</p>
<p>6.  <strong>Human-free manufacturing.</strong>  Robots rule.  I thought this was already the case?</p>
<p>7.  <strong>Perfect image recognition</strong>.  Object recognition in images is being worked on all over the place, for sure, and everyone&#8217;s favorite human-shaped robot <a href="http://world.honda.com/ASIMO/technology/intelligence.html">Asimo</a> is currently learning to recognise objects.</p>
<p>8. <strong> Big Brother never sleeps</strong> - yup, if we&#8217;re not being tracked already through every step we take, we&#8217;re about to be.  The UK government right now is trialling satellite tracking technology to help us all live better lives.  Sorry, I meant to tax us more and fine us if we pause on double yellow lines too long&#8230;</p>
<p>9.  <strong>Unbroken connectivity</strong> - that would be good</p>
<p>10.  <strong>Relationship enhancement</strong> - using technology to enhance our offline relationships (e.g. automatically storing their kids names for future recall).  Sure to happen.</p>
<p>Finally, then, a couple of my own along the same lines:</p>
<p>11.  <strong>Today&#8217;s top online brands won&#8217;t be the top brands in 10 years or even less</strong> (Facebook, Google, etc).  Hard to imagine, but almost guaranteed.</p>
<p>12.  <strong>Unified messaging</strong>.  I don&#8217;t actually care whether the message I just got was through Twitter, an SMS, the Blackberry Messaging service, interpreted voice via Spinvox, an email, smoke signals, or someone shouting across the room.  I really just care about the message.  Unify them, please, before I go mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/09/10-future-shock-predictions-well-12-actually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SatNav, wrong turns, and social driving</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/03/satnav-wrong-turns-and-social-driving/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/03/satnav-wrong-turns-and-social-driving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 17:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often, a product idea just clicks.  This is one of them - a virtual &#8220;cable&#8221; projected onto the windscreen that shows you exactly the turning you need to take.  Simple.  Brilliant.  Check out the videos on their site.

While I&#8217;m on the subject, a bit more TomTom - style &#8220;social&#8221; networking of real-time traffic information would [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every so often, a product idea just clicks.  This is one of them - <a href="http://www.mvs.net/"><strong>a virtual &#8220;cable&#8221;</strong></a> projected onto the windscreen that shows you exactly the turning you need to take.  Simple.  Brilliant.  Check out the videos on their site.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mvs.net/"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-193" title="cable" src="http://blog.alexkelleher.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/cable.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="310" /></a></p>
<p>While I&#8217;m on the subject, a bit more TomTom - style &#8220;social&#8221; networking of <a href="http://www.tomtom.com/page/HD_Home">real-time traffic information </a>would be welcome.  GPS routing on my 3G blackberry, where they offer some real-time traffic info is poor (make one different turning and downloading the new roads takes too long to catch up).  RDS doesn&#8217;t really work, and waiting for radio traffic reports is really, really old now.</p>
<p>Social driving brings up all sorts of new networking opportunities (stuck in the same traffic jam?  Drive the same route to work each day?  Want to send insults to the driver in the car in front?) - which you&#8217;ll either hate or love, depending on your viewpoint.  Me, I&#8217;d like to know in real time the quickest way to get from A to B in real-time, and not make too many wrong turns along the way&#8230; Simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/10/03/satnav-wrong-turns-and-social-driving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China has more internet users than any other country</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/26/china-has-more-internet-users-than-any-other-country/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/26/china-has-more-internet-users-than-any-other-country/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Statistics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[253 million at the latest count, according to the government agency China Internet Network Information Centre.   Impressively, 214 million of those are broadband users - but the biggest growth is mobile phone access.   Apparently, the &#8220;Great Firewall of China&#8221; is still blocking or rendering unusable large numbers of sites, so any strategy looking to address [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>253 million at the latest count, according to the government agency <a href="http://www.cnnic.net.cn" target="_blank">China Internet Network Information Centre</a>.   Impressively, 214 million of those are broadband users - but the biggest growth is mobile phone access.   Apparently, the &#8220;<a href="http://www.developingtelecoms.com/content/view/1404/26/" target="_blank">Great Firewall of China</a>&#8221; is still blocking or rendering unusable large numbers of sites, so any strategy looking to address China needs to have local hosting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/26/china-has-more-internet-users-than-any-other-country/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploring the news, visually</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/25/exploring-the-news-visually/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/25/exploring-the-news-visually/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 16:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=183</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve said on here before that not enough visualisation is being used, so it&#8217;s great to find new ideas - even if they&#8217;re not totally useable/useful. DoodleBuzz is one such example, you could call it the Zen of news exploration. Even after 5 minutes of doodling, I have relatively little idea of what&#8217;s going on. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve said on here before that not enough visualisation is being used, so it&#8217;s great to find new ideas - even if they&#8217;re not totally useable/useful. <a href="http://www.doodlebuzz.com/" target="_blank">DoodleBuzz</a> is one such example, you could call it the Zen of news exploration. Even after 5 minutes of doodling, I have relatively little idea of what&#8217;s going on. But I do feel a lot calmer.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.doodlebuzz.com/" target="_blank"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-184" title="doodle" src="http://blog.alexkelleher.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/doodle.gif" alt="" width="300" height="191" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/25/exploring-the-news-visually/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Dude&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/20/dude/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/20/dude/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 21:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media Marketing]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Given that I use this as a demonstration of an effective, viral-style ad quite a bit, I thought it was about time I posted it here.   At 2.2m views, and 2,500 comments (as well as a bunch of either copy, copycat or homage videos with strong incremental viewing) it&#8217;s a resounding example of YouTube appeal, and all upside [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that I use this as a demonstration of an effective, viral-style ad quite a bit, I thought it was about time I posted it here.   At 2.2m views, and 2,500 comments (as well as a bunch of either copy, copycat or homage videos with strong incremental viewing) it&#8217;s a resounding example of YouTube appeal, and all upside for Budweiser (who manfully held back from using many branded bottles in the commercial, adding to its appeal probably).   More than that, hundreds (if not thousands) of blogs have done what I&#8217;m doing - giving it even more exposure.</p>
<p>Now <strong>there&#8217;s</strong> viral value.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmFBOVZ6BLM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WmFBOVZ6BLM&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/20/dude/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>5 minutes of zero gravity</title>
		<link>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/17/5-minutes-of-zero-gravity/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/17/5-minutes-of-zero-gravity/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.alexkelleher.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just went to an event with Dick Powell from product design agency Seymour Powell talking about all aspects of design and creativity as part of DesignLondon.  It was good material about some of their now iconic designs for kettles, toasters, toilets and the like. 
The fact that he could have given (and probably did give) the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went to an event with Dick Powell from product design agency <a href="http://www.seymourpowell.com/">Seymour Powell</a> talking about all aspects of design and creativity as part of <a href="http://www.designlondon.net/news&amp;events">DesignLondon</a>.  It was good material about some of their now iconic designs for kettles, toasters, toilets and the like. </p>
<p>The fact that he could have given (and probably did give) the same presentation 10 years ago sums up the bascis that are true of the design process - just the products change a bit.   To demonstrate that, he ended his talk with this video for Virgin&#8217;s upcoming space travel programme (Seymour Powell designed the interior of the space craft).  Yes, that&#8217;s <em>space craft</em> - launching in 2010, at <a href="http://www.virgingalactic.com">Virgin Galactic</a>, bookable right now.  Get a taste of what your $200,000 dollars will buy you :</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/09C795Rn3zk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/09C795Rn3zk&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.alexkelleher.com/2008/09/17/5-minutes-of-zero-gravity/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
