Monthly Archives: July 2008

Popular = interesting?

It’s probably a deeply human shortcut, but we really often want to know what’s the most POPULAR thing, in whatever category we’re looking at.  So i thought I’d do that quickly on a couple of sites.  Right now, this is the most popular presentation in english on slideshare with half a million views:

Lots of truth in that one, I’ve seen slides like 36 a number of times…

Almost reaching those dizzying height of views is this collection of “accidents” on docstoc:


Why I Got Fired – Get more Creative Writing

Meanwhile, over at YouTube, Avril Lavigne managed to get over 93,000,000 views on this music video, and on digg.com, the cracking of DRM protection made it to 49,000 diggs.

What does this all say?  Well, the most popular stories aren’t necessary the stories of interest to everyone – and in each situation above there is probably a story behind the popularity which promoted that particular item to the top.  For the same sort of reasons reason that “yahoo” appears to be the most popular search term on Google, popularity doesn’t mean interest or relevance.  But it might be a good pointer, if taken as part of a metric for determining what is “good”.

Not on good Phorm…

New Media Age and PC Pro both lead their most recent issues with stories covering the recent demise – and more recent rebirth – of Phorm.  Yes, the people who plan to spy on your every web site visit by sitting between you and the internet at your ISP.  A lot of screen inches have been taken up by what’s already been said in countless blog articles, the now infamous “Bad Phorm“, and sharper-eyed sources like The Equity Kicker.

Well, actually Phorm’s ideas are, if not that exciting in terms of what they’re doing with data, a valid attempt to try and personalise advertising content for users.  By observing what individual users do (in “buckets” of interest category), and then replacing ads within the OIX with ads that match that category, they are at least attempting to deliver more interesting and relevant content. 

They are heavily restricted by their domain of influence (ad spaces within OIX sites), and by the fact that the hyperbolically negative PR (or justified concern, depending on your viewpoint) has restricted what they actually store about a user’s behaviour. 

So where is the benefit as a user in this area of behavioural targeting?  Well, ideally the targeter will work as a “trusted friend”, providing input and ideas for that user based on everything they know about that person.  Trusted friends have access to a fair amount of information – the more trusted, the more information.  They (ideally) won’t share that information, abuse or expose it.  And ultimately their suggestions will motivated by being to the benefit to the USER.  Advertisers, shops, other people – all come second.

That, anyway, is where I think this industry is heading, slowly (and often unwillingly).  And so the winners in this market space will have found a way to take the position of that trusted friend, and grow the trust, the profile and the benefit over time.

No suprise that I’m working on just such an idea…